Title: A Clockwork Orange
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Year: 1971
Country: UK
Language: English
Country: UK
Language: English
For many years I have loved Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange, I have quoted the hero/villain
Alex (Malcolm McDowell) many times, debated the film’s ideology constantly and
started singing “singin in the rain” heartily in many odd situation. Throughout
these many years there has always been one scene on my mind, the scene where
Alex and his droogs beat the hell out of a man and rape his wife while he is
watching, all the while singing “singing in the rain” in a joyous tune. This use of the song used in the infamous rape
scene famously pissed off Gene Kelly, the lead of the 50’s musical classic Singin in the Rain. This one scene has
caused a great moral dilemma in me. Is Kubrick glorifying rape?
In the first half hour Alex is the typical asshole, he’s the
kind of guy who would go to a bar, get drunk, come home and beat his wife half
to death because he felt like it. He’s an inhumane rapist that, if given the
opportunity, would screw over everyone in his life. He is a selfish, egotistical,
brute and isn’t really a “hero” in any sense because Kubrick makes no effort to
explore Alex’s motives or the society in which Alex lives in. The only “intelligent” and human aspect we get from
Alex is that he loves Beethoven’s music. Why? Who knows. However, this love for
Beethoven’s 9th does create an incredible soundtrack for the film.
Kubrick knows how to use music to make his films better.
The soundtrack and the camera are used to glorify the film’s
“protagonist”. The only “intelligent”
and human aspect we get from Alex is that he loves Beethoven’s music. Why? Who
knows. Perhaps Kubrick wants us subconsciously thinking “no criminal could like
classical music!”. Whenever we see the film through Alex’s eyes it seems like Alex’s
world in a madhouse, with crazy people out
to get him. The camera angles and shots also suggest that only Alex is normal
in his world and he is much more noble than his society.
Featured: Typical Clockwork Orange fan |
This film seems to be about the “individual vs society” in
which Alex is an asshole who does rape a lot of people but what the government
does to him, forcing him to watch hours of
horrible violence which makes him get incredibly sick whenever he thinks
of doing a violent or “wrong behavior” , is much a worse than Alex’s crimes.
Well, is the inhumane punishment by the government worse that Alex’s crimes? If
Alex was a changed man by the end of this film I would say yes. However, when
Alex is “cured” of the government imposed “disease” he still remains an
asshole. He will still rape and murder people just because he feels like
it. Kubrick, what is the point? Alex is
not on the border of good and evil, he is not doing a just action, he is not
harming the corrupt government, he is harming innocent people for no reason!
Back to my main question, is Kubrick glorifying rape in A Clockwork Orange? I would most definitely
say yes. On the surface the addition of “singin’ in the rain” makes for some
great dark humor in an otherwise terrifying scene...but should there be humor
in rape? Should we find this scene entertaining? Alex just barged into an old
couple’s home, destroyed their stuff, beat the hell out of an old man and raped an
old woman- for no reason- and we are supposed to cheer this guy on? Perhaps,
though I realize this is a stretch, Kubrick is suggesting that Alex’s society
isn’t sick and perverted, our society is.
Many people will suggest that this review is "wrong" or "too harsh", that Kubrick actually had great intentions with this film. Kubrick used this film to make a "statement". I understand how difficult my review is to grasp because Kubrick is a film God, why would a film God create a film so bad? Because of this we grasp for straws, there must be some "statement" Kubrick is trying to make. Although nobody reading this has talked to Kubrick directly about this film, so therefore nobody reading really knows what Kubrick's intentions were. I can easily justify Jersey Shore, claiming it's genius because it exposes our society's need to glorify douchebags and bimbos, but that doesn't make it true.
Many people will suggest that this review is "wrong" or "too harsh", that Kubrick actually had great intentions with this film. Kubrick used this film to make a "statement". I understand how difficult my review is to grasp because Kubrick is a film God, why would a film God create a film so bad? Because of this we grasp for straws, there must be some "statement" Kubrick is trying to make. Although nobody reading this has talked to Kubrick directly about this film, so therefore nobody reading really knows what Kubrick's intentions were. I can easily justify Jersey Shore, claiming it's genius because it exposes our society's need to glorify douchebags and bimbos, but that doesn't make it true.
In conclusion, it’s a shame that the great Stanley Kubrick;
the director of the incredible 2001: A
Space Odyssey, stooped to such a low level with A Clockwork Orange. I’m not sure what was going through his mind, I
wouldn’t like to know what was in his mind when he made this film that seems to
glorify evil. Kubrick is a master of his
craft, indeed he did fool us with masterful cinematography into sympathizing
with the deranged Alex, however this is easily one of his worst films. Like my first review Fight Club, this film uses great visuals and shady philosophy to fool many
viewers. Piss on it! 1/5
No comments:
Post a Comment